Home Courses Vita Research Interests  
         

EDU 8603 – Educational Research

 

Tuesday and Thursday,

3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Old Falvey - Room 104

Credit Hours: 3

 

Professor: Dr. Edward Garcia Fierros

Phone: 610 519-6969

Email: edward.fierros@villanova.edu

Office: St. Augustine Center for the Liberal Arts Room 359

Office Hours: by appointment – please email me at Edward.fierros@villanova.edu or leave me a phone message

URL: http://www.homepage.villanova.edu/Edward.Fierros

 

“no natural history can be interpreted in the absence of at least some implicit body of intertwined theoretical and methodological belief that permits selection, evaluation, and criticism.” Kuhn

Required Texts:

    • McMillan, J.H. (2004). Educational Research: Fundamentals for the Consumer (4th Ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc
    • Readings as assigned.

 

Course Description: Analysis of diverse types of educational research; familiarization with research resources and literature survey procedures; evaluation of educational research; its implications for, and application to, educational practice; emphasis on the scientific methods of investigation; development of competency to conduct a research study and write a research paper.

 

Course Overview

"To endure the speech of false ideas and then to counter is part of learning how to live in a democratic society, a society which insists upon open discourse toward the end of a tolerant citizenry."

-Justice Kennedy, Slee v. Weisman 1990

With new advances in technology, the free to exchange of ideas is easier than ever before. It is, however, up to each of us to decide for ourselves what information to trust and what to discard. While open-mindedness to new ideas is the mark of wisdom, this does not mean that we should blindly accept anything that researchers, news-media, or even close friends have to tell us without evaluating the validity of their statements.

The major goal of this course is to help you critically reflect upon some of the research claims you may encounter in your everyday teaching life. Several common criteria for evaluating the trustworthiness of research claims will be discussed (e.g., reliability, validity) along with some of the important issues that should be addressed when conducted a research study (e.g., bias, ethics). In addition, the course is designed to help you acquire certain skills that will allow you to formulate and study your own in a systematic way.

The emphasis in this course will be on research that you can use in your own classroom (i.e., action research). Each of you will be expected to think about a research topic related to your area of concentration in your Masters program. You will then learn how to formulate several possible research hypotheses, decide on an appropriate approach to gathering data to test your hypotheses, analyze the results, and present a final write-up. In order to make this task more manageable, the final paper will be written in two stages over the course of the entire semester. This will allow you to receive specific feedback on each part of the project as we progress through each section.

The overall goal is to expose you to the process of conducting research that will be useful and meaningful to you and your classroom. The general steps that you will learn throughout this course are the same steps that are followed when preparing research grants and publishing research findings.

 

Course Objectives

 

Students will be able to:

 

1.         Demonstrate how the research process can be effectively used to answer educationally relevant questions.

2.         Understand the theoretical and practical principles of research;

3.         Describe the principles and phases of action research;

4.         Develop the skills and understandings for evaluating published educational research studies;

5.         Know the requirements of completing a research study.

6.         Consider how educational research can be used to meet teacher education standards.

7.         To use correct APA style when citing references including pages numbers!

8.         Explain the basic principles of educational measurement and the types of educational measures.

9.         Students will be able to articulate at least three criteria that distinguish good research from poor research.

10.     Design an appropriate action research proposal based on observations of your field placement observations.

 

Pennsylvania Teacher Performance Standards:

A. Managing the instructional environment including:

  • creating a climate that promotes fairness,
  • establishing and maintaining a rapport with students,
  • communicating clear, challenging learning expectations to each student,
  • establishing and maintaining consistent standards of classroom behavior,
  • creating a safe environment conducive to learning,
  • using the instructional time effectively

B. Planning instruction which promotes problem analysis, critical thinking, creativity, leadership development and decision-making based upon:

  • subject matter, organization and integration of content and the relationship of content to educational, career and life goals,
  • students and their learning, motivation, supervision and guidance with emphasis on human behavior and development, individual differences, diversity and the special needs of the exceptional student,
  • the community, and community resources,
  • current educational standards and practices

C. Selecting, analyzing or modifying teaching methods, learning activities and instructional materials, resources and technologies that meet the learning needs of diverse learners, and which are aligned with the goals of the lesson

D. Assessing, evaluating, implementing, adapting and assimilating teaching methods, learning activities and instructional materials, resources and technologies to strengthen the effectiveness and quality of instruction and meet the learning needs of diverse learners

E. Monitoring student progress and performance and adjusting instructional strategies through a variety of assessments and evaluation tools in order to provide student feedback, and strengthen the effectiveness and quality of instruction for improved student learning.

INTASC STANDARDS:

1. Content Pedagogy

The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures of the discipline he or she teaches and can create learning experiences that make these aspects of subject matter meaningful for students.

7. Planning

The teacher plans instruction based upon knowledge of subject matter, students, the community, and curriculum goals.

8. Assessment

The teacher understands and uses formal and informal assessment strategies to evaluate and ensure the continuous intellectual, social, and physical development of the learner.

9. Reflective Practice: Professional Growth

The teacher is a reflective practitioner who continually evaluates the effects of his or her choices and actions on others (students, parents, and other professionals in the learning community) and who actively seeks out opportunities to grow professionally.

The candidate:

  • uses classroom observation, information about students and research as sources for evaluating the outcomes of teaching and learning and as a basis for experimenting with, reflecting on and revising practice.
  • uses professional literature, colleagues and other resources to support self-development as a learner and as a teacher.
  • consults with professional colleagues within the school and other professional arenas as support for reflection, problem-solving and new ideas, actively sharing experiences and seeking and giving feedback.

COURSE FORMAT

The course will include multiple instructional approaches including: lecture, discussion, small group activities, presentation, and critical reflection activities.

 

Students will be asked to conduct thoughtful discussion of the material assigned for the day’s reading. The course experience will be cooperative in nature with students working in small groups toward resolution of issues and debates raised in class and in the readings. These are not intended to exhaust the potential themes in the course, only to suggest some possible directions for exploration.

 

 

COURSE REQUIREMENTS:

Demonstrate understanding of the material in the text during class discussions; In-class participation, attendance, and professionalism (i.e., in-class activities)

10%

Reading Quizzes

15%

Article Critique

20%

Mid-Term Examination

25%

Action Research Project

30%

 

 

 

 

Tentative Calendar – The professor reserves the right to change the syllabus at any time during the semester. It is your responsibility to note these changes.

Dates

Topic

Required Readings (to be read before class)

¿ = Available via WebCT

Recommended Readings

What is Research and Why Should We Do It?
The term “research” is often used rater loosely in our society. But what exactly do we mean when we talk about “research”? What is that separates research from other ways of knowing?

 

1/17

Syllabus Review - Questions?

Complete Course Pre-Test

*(Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions  pp. 10-51)

What is Action Research? http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~mryder/itc/act_res.html

1/19

Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research

McMillan p. 1-26; ¿ Hendricks 1-20

An Overview of the Methodological Approach of Action Research http://www.web.net/~robrien/papers/arfinal.html

Ethics and Access
Professional societies serve and important function for researchers and society in general. These societies are bound together by a shared devotion to a particular code of conduct, known as ethics. Within the field of Educational Research, there is an established code of conduct that is shared by all legitimate researchers. This section will discuss how the necessity of ethical codes, and whether or not they are truly necessary.

 

Group Assignment. You will be assigned to one of 3 groups. Each group will read and focus on one controversial experiment. Each group member will then write a brief reaction to the study they read. Then each group will share a short summary of their controversial experiment and present the ways the experiment supports or violates ethical standards. The audience will expected to play Devil’s advocate if everyone seems to be on the same side. In other words, what were the benefits to the study? What were the consequences? Was it worth it?

 

1/24

 

 

Ethics in Educational Research

Ethics Presentation

Fraenkel & Wallen (2003).

AERA Ethical Standards http://www.aera.net/about/policy/ethics.htm

 

Quiz #1

 

 

 

 

 

APA Guidelines for Ethical Research (http://www.apa.org/ethics/code.html)

 

Stanford Prison Study (http://www.prisonexp.org/)

 

Links to various Ethics sites on the Web (http://methods.fullerton.edu/chapter3.html)

Defining the Research Problem
The first step in any research project involves brainstorming about the topic area you wish to investigate. All of us have had experience in educational settings, and we all have ideas about how things might have been done better. What are some ideas that you have about how to improve education?

 

Consider three potential research problems that you might want to explore this semester. Submit your list along with methodological approaches - Due 1/31.  Note the possible pros and cons to each of the three questions. 

 

After you receive your graded assignment, write a 1-2 page paper describing a research problem you would like to investigate. Discuss a minimum of two hypotheses related to the question that you might consider investigating in your current study. Make sure that the hypotheses meet the criteria for good hypotheses outlined in McMillan. – Due 2/7.

 

1/26

Conducting Library Searches

Literature Reviews

McMillan – Chapter 3-4

 

 

 

Review of Research in Education (EJournal available via Falvey Library Website)

U.S. Regional Educational Laboratories

http://www.relnetwork.org/

1/31

Research problems, variables, and hypotheses.

McMillan, Ch. 2.

Research Design Explained

http://www.researchmethods.com/

Hypotheses:http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/hypothes.htm

2/2

Qualitative Design

McMillan, Ch. 11.

Qualitative Design Basics http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v9n1/hoepfl.html

 

Part of good planning is anticipating potential problems and then doing what you can to prevent them.

 

2/7

Sampling Procedures

Validity & Reliability

McMillan, Ch. 5-6

 

Quiz #2

Hypotheses: http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/hypothes.htm

2/9

Data Collection

 

McMillan, Ch. 7

Data Collection http://gse.gmu.edu/research/tr/TRcollection.shtml

2/14

Mid-Term Examination

2/16

Analyzing Statistical Inference

McMillan, Ch. 10

Elementary Statistics Primer: What are variables?

http://www.statsoftinc.com/textbook/esc.html#What%20are%20variables

Now that you have decided what topic area you wish to explore and you have a few research questions of interest, it is time to get up to speed on the latest thinking in your field. In developing your Action Research Pre-Project (i.e., rough draft, project introduction/rationale, & literature review) you will explore various approaches for finding out what has been done already in your research area. You will also exchange your paper with a fellow classmate so that you can critique their work.

2/21

Peer Edit Action Research Projects – Rough Draft, Project Intro/Rationale, Literature review

Quiz #3

 

2/23

Quantitative Design – Descriptive, Comparative, Correlational, and Causal-Comparative

McMillan, Ch. 8

 

Article Critiques Due

¿ Porter, A.C. (1997). Comparative Experiments in Education Research in Methods for research in Education 2nd Edition. Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.

2/28

Experimental and Single-Subject, Interpreting Results

McMillan, Ch. 9

Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation. http://pareonline.net/Home.htm

 

3/2

Using Research as a Teacher

Grant Opportunities

Final Project Due

 

           

 

Late Assignments: If you must turn in an assignment late, you are expected to notify me in advance or to be able to provide some proof of your trouble. If you do not satisfy these criteria, submit your assignment! Assignments/papers that are late will be docked 10% of their value for each day they are late.

 

Grading: Your course grade will be based upon a standard conversion of the total points you have earned into a corresponding letter grade, as follows:

A = 93% and above     B+ = 87-89%               C+ = 77-79%     D = 60-69%
A - = 90-92%               B    = 83-86                 C = 73-76          F = 59% and below
                                    B - = 80-82                  C - = 70-72

Writing Guidelines: The course reflection papers will be graded using the following guidelines:

 

Exceptional 10 -9

Thoughtful, accurate, and thorough discussion.

Answers include analysis or synthesis of the topic(s).

Adequate  8 –7

Limited but accurate discussion

Summary information from texts and resources with limited analysis.

Inadequate 7 and below

Lacks understanding and/or not accurate discussion

Limited summary and analysis from text and resources about the topic.

Academic Integrity: As a community committed to the Augustinian ideals of truth, unity and love, Villanova University prides itself on maintaining the highest standards of academic integrity and does not tolerate any form of academic dishonesty or misconduct. Dishonesty (including plagiarism) in any assignment, test or examination is punishable by the grade of F and is to be reported, through the deans, to the Vice President for Academic Affairs. A second offense will result in the dismissal of the student from Villanova University.

 

Students with Special Needs

 

The Office of Learning Support Services, in conjunction with faculty, provides reasonable accommodations for students with various special needs.  Often students are hesitant to request support since they have done so well through high school and are now part of a competitive university.  However, disabilities are not something that you outgrow - it is something that you learn to master.

 

In order to obtain accommodations, students must register with the Learning Support Office by submitting current documentation.  To ensure confidentiality, students must complete a Request for Accommodation Form each semester at Villanova in order to receive accommodations during that semester.  Nothing can be shared with your professors without your permission.  Call or email the office for an appointment. Phone: 610-519-5636 E-mail:  nancy.mott@villanova.edu

 

Mid-Term Examination – February 14, 2005

Your mid-term examination will include multiple-choice, short-answer constructed response, and extended constructed response items (i.e., questions).

 

Final Project - Action Research Proposal – Due March 2, 2005

 

Based on your school observations (at your field placement school), propose an action research project that could be conducted at the school. The project will include:

 

1)                 a statement of purpose

2)                 a rationale for why it should be studied

3)                 review of the related research literature description of the data collection methods which includes design, selection of subjects, instruments, and procedures

4)                 description of proposed data analysis

5)                 proposals for possible implementation plans and how they would be evaluated.

 

Your Action Research Proposal should be in American Psychological Association (APA) style, 9-12 pages long, typed and double-spaced. 
 

Article Critique of Quantitative Research- Assignment Format

 

Format your assignment as listed in the Assignment Outline (A-H).

Follow this “lettered listing” exactly to aid in the evaluation process.

Items C1-3, D1-2, E1-2, F1-2, G1-3 must each receive a paragraph response (12 paragraphs total).

1. Begin each paragraph with a clear statement in response to the question.

2. Follow your response statement with no less than two supportive statements.

Supportive statements are examples, or descriptions, or quotes from the Research Article.

3. If an item is omitted by the author, simply write “this item omitted” instead of the paragraph response described above in 1-2.

 

Assignment Outline (A-H)

 

A. Your Full Name

B. Enter the Assignment #

C. Problem Section

 

C1. Does the problem statement clearly communicate the study's purpose?

C2. Is the hypothesis clearly stated?

C3. Does the author provide operational definitions of the variables?

 

D. Sample Section

 

D1. Is the study's population properly defined, described, and delimited?

D2. Is the method of sampling properly described?

 

E. Instrumentation

 

E1. Does the author describe the types of instruments used to assess the subjects?

E2. Were instrument reliability and validity discussed?

 

F. Procedures

 

F1. Is there a description of the procedures used to administer the instruments?

F2. Does the author identify any of the study's administrative or procedural limitations?

 

G. Statistical Techniques and Results

 

G1. Were appropriate statistical techniques used, and significance levels reported?

G2. Were tables and graphs presented in a clear and understandable fashion?

G3. Is there any evidence that the author took liberties with the generalizability of the findings?

 

 Article Critique Qualitative Research - Assignment Format

 

Format your assignment as listed in the Assignment Outline (A-F).

Follow this “lettered listing” exactly to aid in the evaluation process.

Items C1-4, D1-4, E1-4 must each receive a paragraph response (12 paragraphs total).

1. Begin each paragraph with a clear statement in response to the question.

2. Follow your response statement with no less than two supportive statements.

Supportive statements are examples, or descriptions, or quotes from the Research Article.

3. If an item is omitted by the author, simply write “this item omitted” instead of the paragraph response described above in 1-2.

 

Assignment Outline (A-F)

 

A. Your Full Name

B. Enter the Assignment #

C. Description of the Data

 

C1. Were the participants properly and completely described?

C2. Was the setting properly and completely described?

C3. Were the circumstances under which the data were collected completely described?

C4. Were the ways in which the themes were developed for analysis described?

 

D. Organization of the Data

 

D1. Was the research question/paradigm described adequately so you knew what is being asked, (i.e., what type of study is it?).

D2. What type of methodological tools were employed, i.e. case study, interview, observation, document analysis?

D3. Were the tools adequately described so you knew what the authors measured?

D4. What type of categorical analyses of data were utilized?

 

E. Interpretation of the Data

 

E1. Was sufficient descriptive information given to allow the reader to conclude that the author's interpretations were grounded in the data?

E2. Does the researcher address internal validity through “triangulation”, that is, verification of findings via other documentation / other sources / other researchers?

E3. Does the author acknowledge as a limitation the lack of generalizability of the study's findings, and/or suggest a replication study?

E4. Does the author make suggestions for future research based upon the study's findings and critique the author's own findings in the present study?

F. End-of-Assignment

 

Home Courses Vita Research Interests