EDU 8603 – Educational Research
|
|
Tuesday and Thursday,
3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Old Falvey - Room 104
Credit Hours: 3
|
Professor: Dr. Edward
Garcia Fierros
Phone:
610 519-6969
Email:
edward.fierros@villanova.edu
Office:
St. Augustine Center for the Liberal Arts Room 359
Office
Hours: by appointment
– please email me at Edward.fierros@villanova.edu or leave me a
phone message
URL:
http://www.homepage.villanova.edu/Edward.Fierros
|
|
“no
natural history can be interpreted in the absence of at least
some implicit body of intertwined theoretical and methodological
belief that permits selection, evaluation, and criticism.”
Kuhn
Required Texts:
-
McMillan, J.H. (2004). Educational Research:
Fundamentals for the Consumer (4th Ed.).
Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc
-
Readings as assigned.
|
|
Course Description:
Analysis of diverse types of educational research;
familiarization with research resources and literature survey
procedures; evaluation of educational research; its implications
for, and application to, educational practice; emphasis on the
scientific methods of investigation; development of competency
to conduct a research study and write a research paper.
|
|
Course Overview
"To endure the speech of false ideas and then to counter is part of
learning how to live in a democratic society, a society which
insists upon open discourse toward the end of a tolerant
citizenry."
-Justice
Kennedy, Slee v. Weisman 1990
With new advances in technology, the free to exchange of
ideas is easier than ever before. It is, however, up to each of
us to decide for ourselves what information to trust and what to
discard. While open-mindedness to new ideas is the mark of
wisdom, this does not mean that we should blindly accept
anything that researchers, news-media, or even close friends
have to tell us without evaluating the validity of their
statements.
The major goal of this course is to help you critically
reflect upon some of the research claims you may encounter in
your everyday teaching life. Several common criteria for
evaluating the trustworthiness of research claims will be
discussed (e.g., reliability, validity) along with some
of the important issues that should be addressed when conducted
a research study (e.g., bias, ethics). In addition, the
course is designed to help you acquire certain skills that will
allow you to formulate and study your own in a systematic way.
The emphasis in this course will be on research that you
can use in your own classroom (i.e., action research).
Each of you will be expected to think about a research topic
related to your area of concentration in your Masters program.
You will then learn how to formulate several possible research
hypotheses, decide on an appropriate approach to gathering data
to test your hypotheses, analyze the results, and present a
final write-up. In order to make this task more manageable, the
final paper will be written in two stages over the course of the
entire semester. This will allow you to receive specific
feedback on each part of the project as we progress through each
section.
The overall goal is to expose you to the process of
conducting research that will be useful and meaningful to you
and your classroom. The general steps that you will learn
throughout this course are the same steps that are followed when
preparing research grants and publishing research findings.
Course
Objectives
Students will
be able to:
1.
Demonstrate how the research process can be effectively used to answer
educationally relevant questions.
2.
Understand the theoretical and practical principles of research;
3.
Describe the principles and phases of action research;
4.
Develop the skills and understandings for evaluating published
educational research studies;
5.
Know the requirements of completing a research study.
6.
Consider how educational research can be used to meet teacher education
standards.
7.
To use correct APA style when citing references including pages
numbers!
8.
Explain the basic principles of educational measurement and the types
of educational measures.
9.
Students will be able to articulate at least three criteria that
distinguish good research from poor research.
10.
Design an appropriate action research proposal based on
observations of your field placement observations.
Pennsylvania Teacher Performance Standards:
A. Managing the
instructional environment including:
-
creating a climate that promotes fairness,
-
establishing and maintaining a rapport with
students,
-
communicating clear, challenging learning
expectations to each student,
-
establishing and maintaining consistent
standards of classroom behavior,
-
creating a safe environment conducive to
learning,
-
using the instructional time effectively
B. Planning
instruction which promotes problem analysis, critical thinking,
creativity, leadership development and decision-making based
upon:
-
subject matter, organization and integration of
content and the relationship of content to educational,
career and life goals,
-
students and their learning, motivation,
supervision and guidance with emphasis on human behavior and
development, individual differences, diversity and the
special needs of the exceptional student,
-
the community, and community resources,
-
current educational standards and practices
C. Selecting,
analyzing or modifying teaching methods, learning activities and
instructional materials, resources and technologies that meet
the learning needs of diverse learners, and which are aligned
with the goals of the lesson
D. Assessing,
evaluating, implementing, adapting and assimilating teaching
methods, learning activities and instructional materials,
resources and technologies to strengthen the effectiveness and
quality of instruction and meet the learning needs of diverse
learners
E. Monitoring
student progress and performance and adjusting instructional
strategies through a variety of assessments and evaluation tools
in order to provide student feedback, and strengthen the
effectiveness and quality of instruction for improved student
learning.
INTASC STANDARDS:
1. Content Pedagogy
The teacher
understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and
structures of the discipline he or she teaches and can create
learning experiences that make these aspects of subject matter
meaningful for students.
7. Planning
The teacher plans
instruction based upon knowledge of subject matter, students,
the community, and curriculum goals.
8. Assessment
The teacher
understands and uses formal and informal assessment strategies
to evaluate and ensure the continuous intellectual, social, and
physical development of the learner.
9. Reflective
Practice: Professional Growth
The teacher is a
reflective practitioner who continually evaluates the effects of
his or her choices and actions on others (students, parents, and
other professionals in the learning community) and who actively
seeks out opportunities to grow professionally.
The candidate:
-
uses
classroom observation, information about students and
research as sources for evaluating the outcomes of teaching
and learning and as a basis for experimenting with,
reflecting on and revising practice.
-
uses
professional literature, colleagues and other resources to
support self-development as a learner and as a teacher.
-
consults
with professional colleagues within the school and other
professional arenas as support for reflection,
problem-solving and new ideas, actively sharing experiences
and seeking and giving feedback.
|
|
COURSE FORMAT
The course will
include multiple instructional approaches including: lecture,
discussion, small group activities, presentation, and critical
reflection activities.
Students will
be asked to conduct thoughtful discussion of the material
assigned for the day’s reading. The course experience will be
cooperative in nature with students working in small groups
toward resolution of issues and debates raised in class and in
the readings. These are not intended to exhaust the potential
themes in the course, only to suggest some possible directions
for exploration.
|
|
COURSE REQUIREMENTS:
|
Demonstrate understanding of the material in the text
during class discussions; In-class participation,
attendance, and professionalism (i.e., in-class
activities) |
10% |
|
Reading
Quizzes |
15% |
|
Article
Critique |
20% |
|
Mid-Term Examination |
25% |
|
Action
Research Project |
30% |
|
|
|
|
|
Tentative
Calendar
– The professor reserves the right to change the syllabus at any
time during the semester. It is your responsibility to note
these changes. |
|
Dates |
Topic |
Required
Readings (to be read before class)
¿
= Available via
WebCT |
Recommended Readings |
|
What is
Research and Why Should We Do It?
The term “research” is often used rater loosely in our society.
But what exactly do we mean when we talk about “research”? What
is that separates research from other ways of knowing?
|
|
1/17 |
Syllabus Review
- Questions?
Complete Course
Pre-Test |
*(Kuhn, The
Structure of Scientific Revolutions pp. 10-51) |
What is Action
Research?
http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~mryder/itc/act_res.html |
|
1/19 |
Qualitative vs.
Quantitative Research |
McMillan p.
1-26; ¿
Hendricks 1-20 |
An Overview of
the Methodological Approach of Action Research
http://www.web.net/~robrien/papers/arfinal.html |
|
Ethics and Access
Professional societies serve and important function for
researchers and society in general. These societies are bound
together by a shared devotion to a particular code of conduct,
known as ethics. Within the field of Educational Research, there
is an established code of conduct that is shared by all
legitimate researchers. This section will discuss how the
necessity of ethical codes, and whether or not they are truly
necessary.
Group Assignment. You will be assigned to one of 3 groups. Each group will read and
focus on one controversial experiment. Each group member will
then write a brief reaction to the study they read. Then each
group will share a short summary of their controversial
experiment and present the ways the experiment supports or
violates ethical standards. The audience will expected to play
Devil’s advocate if everyone seems to be on the same side. In
other words, what were the benefits to the study? What were the
consequences? Was it worth it?
|
|
1/24
|
Ethics in
Educational Research
Ethics Presentation |
Fraenkel &
Wallen (2003).
AERA Ethical
Standards
http://www.aera.net/about/policy/ethics.htm
Quiz #1
|
APA Guidelines
for Ethical Research (http://www.apa.org/ethics/code.html)
Stanford Prison
Study (http://www.prisonexp.org/)
Links to
various Ethics sites on the Web (http://methods.fullerton.edu/chapter3.html) |
|
Defining the Research Problem
The first step in any research project involves brainstorming
about the topic area you wish to investigate. All of us have had
experience in educational settings, and we all have ideas about
how things might have been done better. What are some ideas that
you have about how to improve education?
Consider three
potential research problems that you might want to explore this
semester. Submit your list along with methodological approaches
- Due 1/31. Note the possible pros and cons to each of the
three questions.
After you
receive your graded assignment, write a 1-2 page paper
describing a research problem you would like to investigate.
Discuss a minimum of two hypotheses related to the question that
you might consider investigating in your current study. Make
sure that the hypotheses meet the criteria for good hypotheses
outlined in McMillan. – Due 2/7.
|
|
1/26 |
Conducting
Library Searches
Literature
Reviews |
McMillan –
Chapter 3-4
|
Review of
Research in Education (EJournal available via Falvey Library
Website)
U.S. Regional
Educational Laboratories
http://www.relnetwork.org/ |
|
1/31 |
Research
problems, variables, and hypotheses. |
McMillan, Ch.
2. |
Research Design
Explained
http://www.researchmethods.com/
Hypotheses:http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/hypothes.htm |
|
2/2 |
Qualitative
Design |
McMillan, Ch.
11. |
Qualitative
Design Basics
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v9n1/hoepfl.html |
|
Part of good
planning is anticipating potential problems and then doing what
you can to prevent them.
|
|
2/7 |
Sampling
Procedures
Validity &
Reliability |
McMillan, Ch.
5-6
Quiz #2 |
Hypotheses:
http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/hypothes.htm |
|
2/9 |
Data Collection
|
McMillan, Ch. 7 |
Data Collection
http://gse.gmu.edu/research/tr/TRcollection.shtml |
|
2/14 |
Mid-Term Examination |
|
2/16 |
Analyzing
Statistical Inference |
McMillan, Ch.
10 |
Elementary
Statistics Primer: What are variables?
http://www.statsoftinc.com/textbook/esc.html#What%20are%20variables |
|
Now that you
have decided what topic area you wish to explore and you have a
few research questions of interest, it is time to get up to
speed on the latest thinking in your field. In developing your
Action Research Pre-Project (i.e., rough draft, project
introduction/rationale, & literature review) you will explore
various approaches for finding out what has been done already in
your research area. You will also exchange your paper with a
fellow classmate so that you can critique their work.
|
|
2/21 |
Peer Edit
Action Research Projects – Rough Draft, Project Intro/Rationale,
Literature review
Quiz #3 |
|
|
2/23 |
Quantitative
Design – Descriptive, Comparative, Correlational, and
Causal-Comparative |
McMillan, Ch. 8
Article
Critiques Due |
¿
Porter, A.C. (1997). Comparative Experiments in Education
Research in Methods for research in Education 2nd
Edition. Washington DC: American Educational Research
Association. |
|
2/28 |
Experimental
and Single-Subject, Interpreting Results |
McMillan, Ch. 9 |
Practical
Assessment, Research, and Evaluation.
http://pareonline.net/Home.htm
|
|
3/2 |
Using Research
as a Teacher
Grant
Opportunities |
Final Project
Due |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Late Assignments:
If you must turn in an assignment late, you are expected to
notify me in advance or to be able to provide some proof of your
trouble. If you do not satisfy these criteria, submit your
assignment! Assignments/papers that are late will be docked 10% of
their value for each day they are late.
Grading: Your course grade will be based upon a standard conversion of the total
points you have earned into a corresponding letter grade, as follows:
A = 93% and above B+ = 87-89% C+ =
77-79% D = 60-69%
A - = 90-92% B = 83-86 C =
73-76 F = 59% and below
B - = 80-82 C - =
70-72
Writing Guidelines: The course reflection papers will be graded using the
following guidelines:
|
Exceptional 10 -9
Thoughtful, accurate, and thorough discussion.
Answers include analysis or synthesis of the topic(s). |
Adequate 8 –7
Limited but accurate discussion
Summary information from texts and resources with limited
analysis. |
Inadequate 7 and below
Lacks understanding and/or not accurate discussion
Limited summary and analysis from text and resources about
the topic. |
Academic Integrity:
As a community committed to the Augustinian ideals of truth, unity and
love, Villanova University prides itself on maintaining the highest
standards of academic integrity and does not tolerate any form of
academic dishonesty or misconduct. Dishonesty (including plagiarism) in
any assignment, test or examination is punishable by the grade of F and
is to be reported, through the deans, to the Vice President for Academic
Affairs. A second offense will result in the dismissal of the student
from Villanova University.
Students with Special Needs
The Office of Learning Support Services,
in conjunction with faculty, provides reasonable accommodations for
students with various special needs. Often students are hesitant to
request support since they have done so well through high school and are
now part of a competitive university. However, disabilities are not
something that you outgrow - it is something that you learn to master.
In order to obtain accommodations,
students must register with the Learning Support Office by submitting
current documentation. To ensure confidentiality, students must
complete a Request for Accommodation Form each semester at Villanova in
order to receive accommodations during that semester. Nothing can be
shared with your professors without your permission. Call or email the
office for an appointment. Phone: 610-519-5636 E-mail: nancy.mott@villanova.edu
Mid-Term Examination – February 14, 2005
Your mid-term examination will include
multiple-choice, short-answer constructed response, and extended
constructed response items (i.e., questions).
Final Project - Action Research Proposal
– Due March 2, 2005
Based on your school observations (at
your field placement school), propose an action research project that
could be conducted at the school. The project will include:
1)
a statement of purpose
2)
a rationale for why it
should be studied
3)
review of the related
research literature description of the data collection methods which
includes design, selection of subjects, instruments, and procedures
4)
description of proposed
data analysis
5)
proposals for possible
implementation plans and how they would be evaluated.
Your Action Research Proposal should be
in American Psychological Association (APA) style, 9-12 pages long,
typed and double-spaced.
Article Critique of Quantitative Research- Assignment Format
Format your assignment as listed in the
Assignment Outline (A-H).
Follow this “lettered listing” exactly
to aid in the evaluation process.
Items C1-3, D1-2, E1-2, F1-2, G1-3 must
each receive a paragraph response (12 paragraphs total).
1. Begin each paragraph with a clear
statement in response to the question.
2. Follow your response statement with
no less than two supportive statements.
Supportive statements are examples, or
descriptions, or quotes from the Research Article.
3. If an item is omitted by the author,
simply write “this item omitted” instead of the paragraph response
described above in 1-2.
Assignment Outline (A-H)
A. Your Full Name
B. Enter the Assignment #
C. Problem Section
C1. Does the problem statement clearly
communicate the study's purpose?
C2. Is the hypothesis clearly stated?
C3. Does the author provide operational
definitions of the variables?
D. Sample Section
D1. Is the study's population properly
defined, described, and delimited?
D2. Is the method of sampling properly
described?
E. Instrumentation
E1. Does the author describe the types
of instruments used to assess the subjects?
E2. Were instrument reliability and
validity discussed?
F. Procedures
F1. Is there a description of the
procedures used to administer the instruments?
F2. Does the author identify any of the
study's administrative or procedural limitations?
G. Statistical Techniques and Results
G1. Were appropriate statistical
techniques used, and significance levels reported?
G2. Were tables and graphs presented in
a clear and understandable fashion?
G3. Is there any evidence that the
author took liberties with the generalizability of the findings?
Article
Critique Qualitative Research - Assignment Format
Format your assignment as listed in the
Assignment Outline (A-F).
Follow this “lettered listing” exactly
to aid in the evaluation process.
Items C1-4, D1-4, E1-4 must each receive
a paragraph response (12 paragraphs total).
1. Begin each paragraph with a clear
statement in response to the question.
2. Follow your response statement with
no less than two supportive statements.
Supportive statements are examples, or
descriptions, or quotes from the Research Article.
3. If an item is omitted by the author,
simply write “this item omitted” instead of the paragraph response
described above in 1-2.
Assignment Outline (A-F)
A. Your Full Name
B. Enter the Assignment #
C. Description of the Data
C1. Were the participants properly and
completely described?
C2. Was the setting properly and
completely described?
C3. Were the circumstances under which
the data were collected completely described?
C4. Were the ways in which the themes
were developed for analysis described?
D. Organization of the Data
D1. Was the research question/paradigm
described adequately so you knew what is being asked, (i.e., what type
of study is it?).
D2. What type of methodological tools
were employed, i.e. case study, interview, observation, document
analysis?
D3. Were the tools adequately described
so you knew what the authors measured?
D4. What type of categorical analyses of
data were utilized?
E. Interpretation of the Data
E1. Was sufficient descriptive
information given to allow the reader to conclude that the author's
interpretations were grounded in the data?
E2. Does the researcher address internal
validity through “triangulation”, that is, verification of findings via
other documentation / other sources / other researchers?
E3. Does the author acknowledge as a
limitation the lack of generalizability of the study's findings, and/or
suggest a replication study?
E4. Does the author make suggestions for
future research based upon the study's findings and critique the
author's own findings in the present study?
F. End-of-Assignment
|